google.com, pub-3110945912229006, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

Recent Posts

Archive

Tags

To NFT or not to NFT, is it a question?

Updated: 7 days ago


Everydays: The First 5000 days, fragment. © Beeple.


Let's be clear, the main reason NFTs dominated the news cycle lately was the fact that Beeple's peace Every Day: First 5000 Days was sold at the Christie's for $69+ million. Its buyer known as MaraKovan says that “This NFT is a significant piece of art history. Sometimes these things take some time for everyone to recognize and realize. I’m OK with that. I had the opportunity to be part of this very important shift in how art has been perceived for centuries.”(CNBC). So, immediately we are thrown in the midst of discussion of relationship between a unique historical significance and its monetary equivalent, crypto or otherwise, also known as commodification. Anything of course can be commodified, and consumerized, as it is in this wild wild world, but there is a specificity to the NFTs and the way it is now permanently attached to the artworld.


There is also this: "Today was supposed to be my second CryptoArt release on NiftyGateway.

Considering the insane and unnecessary waste of electricity involved, I’ve decided to cancel the drop until the issue is addressed." Joanie Lemercier


With the NFT craze raging round us, we feel it is our duty say a few words and consider a few actions on the subject matter. Without clutching those old brushes, and cursing the day blockchain technology and cryptocurrency invaded the pure and pristine artworld, let's have a look at the real implications. Some argue that art is not turned into currency, as the code is not buried in it, only in the token itself, while the original file stays intact.

However, we do need to recognize it for what it is. 1. Code is buried in the file, as soon as it's 'tokenized', as it should be able to be blockchain traceable. 2. You don't have to ever turn it into money, it can sit in your 'wallet' and change value depending on the ethereum fluctuation just as any other currency. Nothing especially bad about it, as whatever is bought for ready money is also gaining 'value'. Not sure that cryptoart is a term here, the art/as much as non art is turned into currency - NFT. Not much different from corporate collectors keeping their possessions in a vault, but a blockchain supported provenance, i.e. nobody will ever will make a fake, and you will get royalties on re-sale.


The ingenious machinations of the speculators as usual lies in the fact that they attached one under-regulated entity (cryptocurrency) to a non-regulated 'industry' - art market, which gives them innumerable opportunities for market manipulations and things of this nature. Business as usual.


Ephemereye is exploring the field, but does't plan to dive into offering NFT minting and selling services until the environmental impact is remedied. If you are still inclined to try and mint your very own NFT, here is the list of platforms to explore:


Superrare

Rarible

MakersPlace

Foundation.app

Blockchain

Portion

Mintable

Mintbase

Opensea


It's great that artists can make money, and as every individual decision will be a manifestation of an individual social conscience, we can only hope that it will be a responsible one. Huzzah to this!


More interesting reading: Atlantic

17 views

©2018 by ephemereye